Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Angelina Wirges vs Emily Welker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wirges vs Welker analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Angelina Wirges vs Emily Welker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wirges 0 - 0 Welker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wirges has won 43.2% of points on their second serve, while Welker has won 37.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wirges, in recent form, has won 58.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Welker has won 57.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.63% and 45.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wirges has saved 47.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Welker has saved 44.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wirges has won 56.67% of matches played (W/L 34/ 26), with Welker winning 53.66% (W/L 22/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wirges has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 29/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17). Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 46/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Wirges has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Welker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 18/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wirges has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.38 while Welker has played against players with an average rank of 187.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wirges has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Welker has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wirges has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Welker has converted 48.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
603
Rank
546
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
771
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
51% (101-98)
Career Total W/L
54% (119-100)
48% (12-13)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Angelina Wirges vs Emily Welker For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wirges VS Welker
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Angelina Wirges | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 53% (8/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (27/31) | 53% (19/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (269/273) | 50% (172/175) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 135 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:19 | 2:12:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 187.48 | 149 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (956/1794) | 71% (794/1126) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (591/956) | 54% (428/794) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (362/838) | 37% (124/332) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (112/232) | 49% (89/183) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (843/1782) | 50% (574/1153) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 53% (8/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (12/25) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 38% (8/3) |
Angelina Wirges Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Angelina Wirges
Player
Valentina Ivanov
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
4
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
10
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
55 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Angelina Wirges
Player
Gina Marie Dittmann
43%
(
43 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
85 of
122)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
44%
(
25 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
63 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelina Wirges
Player
Viola Turini
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
4
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
51%
(
53 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Angelina Wirges
78%
(
89 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
11
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelina Wirges
Player
Amalia Suciu
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelina Wirges
Player
Laura Boehner
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Angelina Wirges
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
32%
(
19 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
15
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelina Wirges
Player
Barbora Michalkova
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
82%
(
77 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emily Welker
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Evelyne Atticia Tiron
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
48 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Wirges Vs Welker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wirges are available here and Welker photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Angelina Wirges
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
